Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit BD Styers's column >>

BD STYERS

Self-Employed
Articles Posted: 21  Links Seeded: 374
Member Since: 9/2011  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Birthright? To Native Americans, White Man is an Illegal Immigrant | Barbara Sehr - seattlepi.com

Seeded on Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:30 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: Seattle news, sports, events, entertainment | seattlepi.com - Seattle Post-Intelligencer
education
Seeded by BD Styers
Advertise | AdChoices

 The white man has more words to tell you how they look to him, but it does not require many words to speak the truth Just as you demean our impoverished brown cousins by demanding that they return from whence they came, it is time you realized that all white people are merely squatters on a land that they never rightfully acquired. Brown people are giving their blood, sweat and tears and risking their life and limb so that the arrogant white man can profit from their toil, while denying their presence. Now you pronounce in your name that that Brown people who reproduce amidst their labor here are not entitled to breathe its citizenship. Instead of lifting your lamp beside the golden door, you seek to shove them through the exit.

It is time your arrogance was met with supremacy. This land is not your land. This land is OUR land. That portion of the Southwest that you stole from the brown man is really THEIR land. Look all around you, and you may hear yourself exclaiming, “We’re in big trouble, Kemo Sabe” . That voice you hear is saying “what do you mean, “we?”

I remind you of the words of our dear Chief Joseph-Nez Perce. Read them and weep:

Our fathers gave us many laws, which they had learned from their fathers. These laws were good. They told us to treat all men as they treated us; that we should never be the first to break a bargain; that it was a disgrace to tell a lie; that we should speak only the truth; that it was a shame for one man to take from another his wife or [to take] his property without paying for it. We were taught to believe that the Great Spirit sees and hears everything, and that he never forgets; that hereafter he will give every man a spirit-home according to his deserts: if he has been a good man, he will have a good home; if he has been a bad man, he will have a bad home. This I believe and all my people believe the same.

 

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • BD Styers's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Native American Children, The Cherokee Lodge
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (94)
BD Styers

It is time your arrogance was met with supremacy. This land is not your land. This land is OUR land. That portion of the Southwest that you stole from the brown man is really THEIR land.

Short, straight, and to the point.

  • 6 votes
#1 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:28 AM EDT
tobiii

Pardon me for pointing out the obvious, but if it wasn't for the establishment of American Society, "Native Americans" would still be living in tepees and declaring war on each others' tribes.

It is time your arrogance was met with supremacy

So, what does Federal, State and Local Law Enforcement think about Supremacist Organizations?

  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:31 AM EDT
3rdtime

So, now we all live in cracker boxes and wage wars on other natives around the world?

  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 9:04 AM EDT
Ripley8

white men have decimated plenty of native populations and have the arrogance to think their way is the best way and that they have some mythical god given right to the land.

  • 6 votes
#1.3 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:37 AM EDT
tobiii

white men have decimated plenty of native populations

Okay, give up everything you own to the Native Americans because they claim it as their birthright.

Tell us all how that works out, mmkay?

To the victor belongs the spoils.

  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:16 AM EDT
Jim Comfort

white men have decimated plenty of native populations and have the arrogance to think their way is the best way and that they have some mythical god given right to the land.

Hey, Rip, are you white? If so, decimated any natives lately? I didn't think so. How many natives have we evil white folks decimated here in the US lately? I don't recall doing any decimating, although I must admit, I've been told my memory is fading of late.

Seems to me that the natives are the ones doing any decimating lately, only it's a financial decimation, what with all the casinos on tribal lands now.

  • 4 votes
#1.5 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:21 AM EDT
Ripley8

I'm white but have relatives who are Native American ( Blackfeet ) .

we are still screwing the real owners of this country.

LiP, Winter 2004, Title: "Trust Us, We're the Government: How to Make $137 Billion of Indian Money Disappear,"Author: Brian Awehali; News from Indian Country, March 8, 2004, Title: "Despite Wealth of Resources, Many Tribes Still Live in Poverty," Author: Angie Wagner; Mainstream Media Coverage: New York Times, April 7, 2004, and the Washington Post, March 14, 2004

The great American land row
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3108713.stm

Rocky Mountain News, August 21, 2003 Indians Underpaid for Land Leases, Official Charges; Appraisal Program Under Norton Targeted by M.E. Sprengelmeyer.

Bismarck Tribune, April 7, 2004, Investigator: Interior Favored Companies by Robert Gehrke.

PR Newswire, February 24, 2005 Cobell Litigation Team: U.S. District Court Reissues Structural Injunction in Cobell V. Norton Indian Trust Case-Full Accounting to Be Complete by January 6, 2008.

Update by Brian Awehali: The Cobell v. Norton case is important because the government is colossally and obviously wrong. This is evident in light of the success of Eloise Cobells team in successive court victories. The sheer scope of the case, its possible precedent-setting resolution, and the ways in which it highlights the current limitations of Native Americans dependent-yet-sovereign status, all provide opportunities for real reform and long-term re-examination of the terms of U.S.-to-Native, government-to-government relations.

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/20-american-indians-sue-for-resources-compensation-provided-to-others/

the fact is this ... we stole this land.

  • 5 votes
#1.6 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:27 AM EDT
fstwarrior

Jim - why don't you go to Pine Ridge, Rose Bud, Ft. Peck or any number of northern Indian reservations and see the decimation being caused by "dominant Society" otherwise known as White people. Since the White people in the government can't keep their treaties, there are plenty of Indians who aren't making it.

Casinos? Of the 126 Indian casinos in the U.S., 23 of them are doing well and 8 are doing very well. Those 8 are putting back into the Indian infrastructure, not only their tribes, but of other tribes as well. More than you can say for the "White" guy who can't keep a treaty or even keep their word.

  • 5 votes
#1.7 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:27 AM EDT
Kavika

Ripley8, your going to confuse them with facts. Something that they choose not to accept.

  • 7 votes
#1.8 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:10 PM EDT
Jim Comfort

the fact is this ... we stole this land.

Speak for yourself, I haven't stolen anything from anyone. But feel free to turn yourself in if you feel yourself legally accountable for theft. My ancestors were Quakers, they didn't steal, kill, or mistreat anyone. And Quakers still don't.

As for casinos? From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_gaming:

Statistics provided by the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC), indicate that there are approximately 400 Indian gaming establishments in the US[citation needed].

  • 3 votes
#1.9 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:43 PM EDT
fstwarrior

You'll note that it says "citation needed" - shows it's not an accurate or true statement.

No, the Quakers didn't steal, kill or mistreat anyone. They were one of the three major religious groups picked by the BIA to ensure that the Indians "lost" their heathen religion and became "Christianized". Of course, they were not as harsh as the Catholics or Episcopalians - but...

  • 2 votes
#1.10 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:17 PM EDT
Jim Comfort

You'll note that it says "citation needed" - shows it's not an accurate or true statement.

Wow, thanks for pointing that out. Because when you go to the NIGC web site and look for yourself - http://www.nigc.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=VfZfhOoHuMc%3d&tabid=943 - you find that there are actually 460 gaming operations in the US. You were absolutely right in the inaccuracy, good find.

Of course, they were not as harsh as the Catholics or Episcopalians - but...

Actually, they not only weren't harsh, but they were respected and accepted by the Native Americans - Iowa History Project.

A little research goes a long way.

  • 4 votes
#1.11 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:58 PM EDT
3rdtime

As a Quaker, the respect that was extended to the Quaker government representatives was real but even they were misguided in believing that forcing Christianity on the Native population was helpful. My Quaker Mother taught me that you draw more flies with honey than with vinegar...

    #1.12 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:36 PM EDT
    Thankful Mom-3182614

    Thanks, for pointing this out. Iust love it when one of my right wing friends get on their little tiny soap box, and tell me they are the "True Americans". I think you have answered that question.

    • 1 vote
    #1.13 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:45 PM EDT
    es_shoes

    Iust love it when one of my right wing friends get on their little tiny soap box, and tell me they are the "True Americans".

    What does this have to do with right wing, left wing, or any wing? I vote mainly conservative, and two of my descendents came over on the Mayflower. One of their relatives was reportedly the last person to be drawn and quartered during the French and Indian War. He was fighting for the "Indians". (My mom loves looking through the history of our family). This happened so long ago that it's unfair to pin it on anyone alive today... It's also unfair to group all "white people" together. If that's done with any other race it's "racist".

    • 2 votes
    #1.14 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:36 PM EDT
    tobiii

    get on their little tiny soap box, tell me they are the "True Americans"

    I always love people who whine about this.

    The 14th Amendment, signed into law in 1868, states that anyone "born or naturalized" in the United States are Citizens. So, in effect, anyone born prior to 1868 could be considered not a "True American", where anyone born (or naturalized) after July 9, 1868, is, indeed, a True American.

    Tell me, Thankful Mom, how many of those people are alive right now at the tender age of 114?

    Because, you see, we are ALL True Americans.

    Feel free to give up all your possessions if you believe you aren't a true American, Thankful Mom. I completely understand your frustration at living in your "stolen" home, on your "stolen" land, driving your "stolen" car on the "stolen" roads while talking on your "stolen" phone while headed to your "stolen" job. Did I miss anything?

    • 3 votes
    #1.15 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:58 PM EDT
    fstwarrior

    Er, no, not true. Ark v. U.S. - says otherwise.

      #1.16 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:05 PM EDT
      curtonthebeach

      The 14th Amendment, signed into law in 1868, states that anyone "born or naturalized" in the United States are Citizens. So, in effect, anyone born prior to 1868 could be considered not a "True American", where anyone born (or naturalized) after July 9, 1868, is, indeed, a True American.

      Big difference between "True American" and Native American.

      • 2 votes
      #1.17 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:52 PM EDT
      fstwarrior

      Yup - and it wasn't until 1924 that Native Americans became citizens of the U. S. after having lived here for over 30,000 years.

      • 3 votes
      #1.18 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:40 PM EDT
      BD Styers

      That voice you hear is saying “what do you mean, “we?”

      "the fact is this ... we stole this land."

      #1.6

        #1.19 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:13 AM EDT
        tobiii

        Stole it from who? The one's who squatted on it?

        • 1 vote
        #1.20 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:20 AM EDT
        BD Styers

        valid point

          #1.21 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:29 AM EDT
          ScottyW1

          well I am about as "white" as you can get and I am a native American, I was born here, raised here and served in the Army. some of my fore-fathers came from other lands, sure, but again I am as "native" as anyone else in this country.

          did American Indians get treated like @!$%#? yes, no question, do they still get treated badly, probably. I think the ranting many do concerning "illegals" is mis-guided and uninformed and understand the Indians were here first and "we" as humans need to find a solution to our many problems, but I won't hang my head in shame because I am white or because my ancestors "stole" this land. Lets all get over the past and work to fix the future.

          • 4 votes
          #1.22 - Sat Oct 29, 2011 8:43 AM EDT
          Reply
          fstwarrior

          And it will go right over their heads.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#2 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:07 AM EDT
          WatcherInTheShadows

          Too bad the situations are no where near simular except in a few details.

            Reply#3 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:24 AM EDT
            M. Remmers

            Right. These immigrants aren't committing acts of genocide against us.

            • 2 votes
            #3.1 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:41 AM EDT
            WatcherInTheShadows

            And you choose the most extreme negative. Unsurprising really. Are you really going to claim that is the only aspect in which the situations differ?

              #3.2 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:52 PM EDT
              WatcherInTheShadows

              Thought so. Thank you sir or ma'am.

                #3.3 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:09 AM EDT
                Reply
                MN American Mom

                So when did people stop being nomadic and actually own a country? There was a time when the continents were grouped together so how does that work?

                Which tribe would have had the rights to what we now call America?

                I know there were wars among tribes for land, was that not genocide?

                • 3 votes
                Reply#4 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:05 AM EDT
                fstwarrior

                Wasn't for the land - was for hunting and fishing "rights". When those changed, they moved to another area. Tribes conducted warfare for infringement on the hunting/fishing grounds, for blood feuds (where a member of another tribe killed a member of this tribe - the relative got first choice in the kill/punishment).

                Read "Custer Died for Your Sins" by Vine DeLoria - you'll learn a lot more.

                • 2 votes
                #4.1 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:09 AM EDT
                BD Styers

                MN American Mom

                So when did people stop being nomadic and actually own a country? There was a time when the continents were grouped together so how does that work?

                REF: #4

                On Theories of Ownership source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property#Theories_of_property

                There exist many theories of property. One is the relatively rare first possession theory of property, where ownership of something is seen as justified simply by someone seizing something before someone else does.[14] Perhaps one of the most popular, is the natural rights definition of property rights as advanced by John Locke. Locke advanced the theory that when one mixes one’s labor with nature, one gains a relationship with that part of nature with which the labor is mixed, subject to the limitation that there should be "enough, and as good, left in common for others."[15]

                  #4.2 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:14 PM EDT
                  BD Styers

                  On John Locke, more than a character from Lost:

                  again from wiki:

                  John Locke FRS ( /ˈlÉ’k/; 29 August 1632 – 28 October 1704), widely known as the Father of Liberalism,[2][3][4] was an English philosopher and physician regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers. Considered one of the first of the British empiricists, following the tradition of Francis Bacon, he is equally important to social contracttheory. His work had a great impact upon the development of epistemology and political philosophy. His writings influenced Voltaire and Rousseau, many Scottish Enlightenment thinkers, as well as the American revolutionaries. His contributions to classical republicanism and liberal theory are reflected in the American Declaration of Independence.[5]

                    #4.3 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:15 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    3rdtime

                    Our fore fathers were, in many ways, ignorant and their perception of the inhabitants of this North America were, to say the least, skewed. The major problem we, as descendants of both Native peoples and illegal immigrants, face is learning to live together in what is now OUR native land.
                    Respect, understanding through education, and living up to our democratic social contract must be our way forward. We have a choice. Either we live together and thrive or we fail and, as a society, die.

                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#5 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 9:10 AM EDT
                    MN American Mom

                    I think the forefathers of both the white and Native American race made many mistakes but I also know that I and most likely you, haven't got a clue as to what those times were really like for the people whoactually lived them. I most certainly do not know what life was like for a white settler, a member of an NA Tribe, a black slave, a Japanese citizen forced into a camp here during a war, a Hmong person brought here from the war because they helped us and can't go home etc... and never will but I do believe lessons were learned and won't be repeated.

                    I support equality in every form, I should not receive anything you do not have the opportunity to have and vice verse. That includes all races living here as citizens. That includes free college, monies, hunting and fishing rights etc... Unfortunately, I do not think that today's standards of specific rights for specific races helps bond all races or promote equality. I would not find it acceptable if my children got free college but yours were left out. I would not find it acceptable if the government paid out money to a black child and not a NA child, If you have any form of separation of rights and/or opportunities then there will always be seperation of the people. I can't support that.

                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#6 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:15 PM EDT
                    BD Styers

                    Double check. Citizens of the Earth first.

                      #6.1 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:17 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      WatcherInTheShadows

                      And if we want to talk about "Native Land" and etc. Why isn't the world trying to invade and sneak into Africa? Where our species arose. It was after all inhabited by all our ancestors at one point or another.

                        #7 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:30 PM EDT
                        MN American Mom

                        I am assuming you are black and if so, that is correct. So being your here first why aren't you getting all the perks the NA are?

                          #7.1 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:52 PM EDT
                          fstwarrior

                          Perks? What perks?

                            #7.2 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:03 PM EDT
                            MN American Mom

                            The tribes here receive compensation for their land, monthly payouts from casinos of which they are the only race allowed to have and run a casino, NA kids get $90,000 pay out from the government at age 18, college, tuition,books, and their dorm rooms are paid for. They get up tp $90,000 to purchase their first home, they get rights to catch more fish and hunt more game than any other race.....Why are you pretending they don't? Are you trying to say you yourself don't get perks?

                            It is proven that the Black race was the first race so why aren't the NA compensating them? It is a fair question.

                            • 1 vote
                            #7.3 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:07 PM EDT
                            WatcherInTheShadows

                            No, I am not black. Humanity evolved in and spread out from Africa. How is a question correct? And you didn't in the least address my statement. Care to? It not. Please just stay silent.

                              #7.4 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:32 PM EDT
                              fstwarrior

                              WOW - when you rant, you rant. Perks? Sorry - in most cases those are payments for the millions of acres, mineral and oil leases, land leases, cattle grazing, timber leasing as a result of being pushed off of your land, having your hair cut, punished for speaking your language, taken from your family, called heathen and "Christianized". Treaty obligations for fishing and hunting for subsistence, not for sport or mass murder like the White guys do. No Tribe, I repeat or maybe I should type slower - but NO TRIBE receives $90K when they get 18 from the government. If they are a successful casino Tribe, such as the Oneida, yes, the Tribe may give the money as a share in the profits from the Casino - but - again - NO TRIBE receives money from the government when they turn 18.

                              So, Las Vegas, Atlantic City, New York, Chicago, Miami are all reservations - they have casinos - not owned or operated by the Indians.

                              Next angry tirade please.

                                #7.5 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:37 PM EDT
                                Kavika

                                I don't know where you get this $80,000 gift when we turn 18. It is not true, period.

                                Perhaps you missed the Cobell decision. The BIA (U.S. Govt) settled this for 3.4 billion dollars, read the case for yourself. It was our money form leases for timber and mineral right that was ''lost'' by the BIA, money held in trust for Native Americans.

                                You seem to forget that the U.S. Government set all this up, not NA's. as for the hunting and fishing are you aware of the ''walleye'' wars of Wisconsin and Minnesota. Look at that decision before you rant on about it.

                                Actually you should do alot of research before you go on your rants.

                                • 1 vote
                                #7.6 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 9:42 PM EDT
                                BD Styers

                                Race is contrived. There are no "races" other than the illusion of difference. We're all meat (not vegetable).

                                • 2 votes
                                #7.7 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:20 PM EDT
                                MN American Mom

                                Your the one lying about the $90,000. I have been told that by many NA families, one of which expressed concern about their son receiving it at such a young age because most of the kids blow it and they also said the drug abuse was rampant on the Rez. I guess these NA are delusional huh? Then there is Mystic Lake NA who get 6 figure incomes from the casino making them I believe the wealthiest tribe in MN.

                                The hunting and fishing rights are a joke...for subsistence? Would that be why they take over their limit and sell them on the side right? Dont even try to say it is not abused because it is and I have personally been offered fish and game for a price which is not at all what your ancestors did it for. I personally would enjoy watching a tribe build canoes like their ancestors did and spear fish a reasonable limit. I hardly think your ancestors had headlamps, 3 pronged steel forks, and boats with motors. Kind of loses the historical value dont you think? I also did not agree with the protests and fights at the lakes and rivers over spear fishing and there were plenty of them as you well know.

                                Your also avoiding the fact the NA get college tuiton, books, and dorm rooms free. I know many NA youth who are while every other race in this country is sunk under student loans. Dont even try to act so surprised when I use the term "perks" Your ancestors did not go to school and if as you state you were forced to adopt the white mans way and are trying to preserve your ancestors way of life, then do tell me how a white mans college fits into the scheme of preservation of the NA ways.

                                If you want to talk about racism, pick up a newspaper in MN and read the employment ads for the casinos that state "Indian Preference" man the s--t would hit the fan if I placed an ad stating "white preference" It is racism but I am sure you will find an excuse that makes it acceptable in your mind.

                                I think it is BS period. I do not disrespect any race including the NA and I believe that we are all important and deserve to have the same rights, responsibilities, and opportunities. Don't you get it? This country will never be united until we all drop the finger pointing, blaming, and entitlements. I never had anything to do with what occurred in the past but my money is part of the pot paying for something I had nothing to do with. You are getting money for something you never had a part of or lived through, I mean seriously how much land do you believe your tribe actually occupied and settled on? You have laid claim to the entire country. So what is your take on the innocent settler that was murdered by a tribe, what is your take about the innocent black man taken from his country...what are they owed? Whose fault was that?

                                • 1 vote
                                #7.8 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:41 PM EDT
                                fstwarrior

                                Indian preference??? sorry ma'am - that's part of the law. An Indian casino has to be managed and operated by Indians.

                                And what is your take on the 65,000,000 who were killed just so "dominant" society could have our land - 'cause we "weren't doing anything with it"? How much land????? Well, we once "owned" 100% and now we "own" 1.3% - how much is that for a loss? Innocent settler? The fella who was told this was Indian land, it is protected by a treaty, and no whites are allowed - but, he goes ahead anyway, hunts "our" game, takes our property, harasses our families - and he's innocent?

                                The Blacks? Talk to the whites about the blacks, not the Indians.

                                You really need to read "Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee" - maybe you'll get over some of your anger.

                                • 1 vote
                                #7.9 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:20 PM EDT
                                Kavika

                                You sure seem to have alot of anger about the subject. I guess that you feel that the Indians are taking advantage of you. Sorry lady, your barking up the wrong tree. Catch up on the legal cases currently in court, it might give you somewhat of a perspective on the situation.

                                • 1 vote
                                #7.10 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:23 PM EDT
                                BD Styers

                                I was hoping this discussion would be more focused on the topic of immigration and the fact that the so-called "Americans" are the illegals here.

                                Sit back, relax and think for a minute. Divide and conquer strategies work only with willing participants.

                                I was born here in Washington, D.C. Does that make me a "Native American"?

                                I am a citizen of the Earth first. I see the same sun rise and moon set as any of you.

                                  #7.11 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:30 PM EDT
                                  BD Styers

                                  Kavika, was hoping I might see you here.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #7.12 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:31 PM EDT
                                  tobiii

                                  that the so-called "Americans" are the illegals here.

                                  You also seem to have forgotten that the Indians were illegal immigrants as well - or did you conveniently forget that part of history?

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #7.13 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:30 AM EDT
                                  BD Styers

                                  Actually no, but only because I can't forget what I don't know. "Indian" is a misnomer because some dude thought he was in the West Indies when he hit the Caribbean Islands (Hispanola?). I've heard of the Aztecs and Mayans farther south. I think northward were Toltecs and Pueblos? And I read Collapse, by Jared Diamond (until I got bored with it) where he states the Vikings tried to settle even farther north but were unable to store enough food for winter, presumably because they didn't adapt to the practices of native cultures.

                                    #7.14 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:43 AM EDT
                                    scar_tissue

                                    The tribes here receive compensation for their land, monthly payouts from casinos of which they are the only race allowed to have and run a casino, NA kids get $90,000 pay out from the government at age 18, college, tuition,books, and their dorm rooms are paid for. They get up tp $90,000 to purchase their first home, they get rights to catch more fish and hunt more game than any other race.....Why are you pretending they don't? Are you trying to say you yourself don't get perks?

                                    I call BS w/o cited sources.

                                    *Somebody told me this* is not a valid source.

                                    Nobody gets $90K for coming of age, free college (unless they have a full scholarship), & a free house in the US.

                                    W/o sources, you are merely blowing wind.

                                    In brief....show me the money, honey.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #7.15 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 6:23 AM EDT
                                    WatcherInTheShadows

                                    And like I asked BD. Why is not the world claiming native rights to Africa? The land WE ALL came from when you get right down to it.

                                      #7.16 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:11 AM EDT
                                      BD Styers

                                      I didn't understand that comment to be for me, but my answer is that we are still oppressed by the same mentality in government today.

                                        #7.17 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:34 AM EDT
                                        WatcherInTheShadows

                                        Why is not the world claiming native rights to Africa? Again.

                                          #7.18 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:36 AM EDT
                                          tobiii

                                          "Indian" is a misnomer

                                          Give it a rest. It's been the accepted reference for over 500 years.

                                          Perhaps doing some research on Paleo-Indian history might open your eyes?

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #7.19 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:21 AM EDT
                                          BD Styers

                                          It's accepted by you. I've also heard the term "red-dot indian".

                                          My eyes are open. I think the article is a good perspective. It speaks on the subject of fair treatment.

                                            #7.20 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:52 PM EDT
                                            tobiii

                                            I think the article is a good perspective.

                                            The article is a portrayal of a victim mentality that is crying for reparations.

                                            they should return to their roots on a continent far, far away

                                            demand a retroactive dismissal of the North American birthright

                                            Too many of us, separated from our warrior spirits were left to swallow our pride and sink slowly in poverty and we drank ourselves into forget-fullness

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #7.21 - Sat Oct 29, 2011 6:46 AM EDT
                                            scar_tissue

                                            I reckon MN American Mom doesn't have any proof to show us re: her $90K claims.

                                            That'd probably be b/c it's not true!

                                            The article is a portrayal of a victim mentality that is crying for reparations.

                                            O, so genocide has no victims, then?

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #7.22 - Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:46 AM EDT
                                            tobiii

                                            separated from our warrior spirits were left to swallow our pride and sink slowly in poverty and we drank ourselves into forget-fullness

                                            miss the quote in my post?

                                              #7.23 - Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:58 AM EDT
                                              BD Styers

                                              tob, I am trying to understand your point(s). You made your first point earlier:

                                              tobiii

                                              Stole it from who? The one's who squatted on it?

                                              #1.20 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:20 AM EDT

                                                #7.24 - Sat Oct 29, 2011 8:10 AM EDT
                                                BD Styers

                                                I posted a link to theory of ownership previous to your comment. The relationship in the article is drawn between current and former "ownership" of this land, and the "theory" link is an attempt to build a foundation for discussing this ownership.

                                                I would be more comfortable speaking on the subject of proprietorship or stewardship, but the article presents itself. I seeded.

                                                Who is responsible for planning and executing a plan for harvesting our natural resources in a responsible manner defined by a purposeful mission of sustainability? Was this responsibility assumed or illegally usurped from previous owner/proprietor/steward?

                                                How has this responsibility been managed or mismanaged?

                                                  #7.25 - Sat Oct 29, 2011 8:17 AM EDT
                                                  Reply
                                                  MN American Mom

                                                  So what is your point? Man moved from continent to continent and I don't see how any race can lay a specific claim because it did change from the time the continents were together and then again when they split.

                                                  My point is all men should be treated as equal and given the same opportunity. Land, race, gender, and religion should have nothing to do with it. That is not the case today. Generations are being held accountable for the past and that is wrong.

                                                  I am not sure what you are asking, no one snuck into the US, so again what point are you trying to make? Do not tell any newsviner to be silent. If you can't clarify your point then don't attempt to make one.

                                                    Reply#8 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:23 PM EDT
                                                    BD Styers

                                                    Wraith777

                                                    No, I am not black. Humanity evolved in and spread out from Africa. How is a question correct? And you didn't in the least address my statement. Care to? It not. Please just stay silent.

                                                    #7.4 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:32 PM EDT

                                                    Wraith, I think they're taking over Africa as we speak. The World Bank and IMF have economic reports on their websites about the status of Africa. The continent is a piece of meat for the industrial complex. Basically I think their using it as a giant strip mine, and the population is the labor force being duped into believing they will have something left when the industrial complex is done with it.

                                                      Reply#9 - Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:36 PM EDT
                                                      WatcherInTheShadows

                                                      So when in doubt resort to conspiracy theory?

                                                        #9.1 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:14 AM EDT
                                                        BD Styers

                                                        I have no doubt.

                                                          #9.2 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:35 AM EDT
                                                          WatcherInTheShadows

                                                          Of course, conjure up some evil conspiracy of "they" that is somehow "taking over" Africa. Right.

                                                            #9.3 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:54 AM EDT
                                                            BD Styers

                                                            Hehe, are you trying to enlighten or is this a jest?

                                                            I don't have energy this morning to provide links, but laughs are OK.

                                                            The same problem exists in Africa as existed in the US.

                                                              #9.4 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:00 AM EDT
                                                              WatcherInTheShadows

                                                              Lacking proof to cite a claim is hollow.

                                                                #9.5 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:04 AM EDT
                                                                BD Styers

                                                                You are correct, and I ain't mad -- opinions are common, and that's what an OpEd is about. Wraith I don't understand the hostility or the contention with my point about Africa. Isn't it true that Europeans have colonized there? I feel like I'm missing something, like maybe someone else insulted you and you've decided it was me.

                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                #9.6 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:10 AM EDT
                                                                WatcherInTheShadows

                                                                Your stance is unjust, insulting, and narrow. I cover it below.

                                                                  #9.7 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:35 AM EDT
                                                                  Reply
                                                                  Laochra

                                                                  I think the biggest hypocrisy of America is how all across every state the “immigration” question has reared its ugly head and each time you hear about how immigrants and their children, regardless of whether they were born on American soil or not, need to go back home. However nearly ALL Americans are the ultimately the products of illegal immigration. You don’t even need to go back that far to see how very many people would not be citizens were it not for their ancestors sneaking into the country.

                                                                  There are millions upon millions of Americans for instance who are decedents of Irish immigration. Between the famine and right up to the late 80’s the vast majority of Irish immigration was illegal, and they claimed citizenship decades after their arrival. Chances are that if you have Irish blood in you and are American, that you’re family were original illegal immigrants.

                                                                  This article has a point. Whitewashing history and saying “well it has nothing to do with me” is just a way for history to repeat itself.

                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                  Reply#10 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:38 AM EDT
                                                                  BD Styers

                                                                  Well said, and thank you Lao. I can't change history, but I can learn from it.

                                                                  • 2 votes
                                                                  #10.1 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:45 AM EDT
                                                                  Reply
                                                                  fstwarrior

                                                                  And, to me, the overall point is that the 14th amendment, as it was originally intended by Senator Howard when he wrote it in 1866, very explicity stated that unless your parents were in the U. S. legally, the child could not become a U. S. citizen just by being born here. The SCOTUS has three cases that supports Senatory Howard's premise. Somewhere in the 80's, right after Reagan announced blanket amnesty to 2.1 million ILLEGALs, the "thought" started changing to - well, if the kids born here, it's gotta be a citizen, right? - with no legal interpretation nor review of Senator Howard's original bill.

                                                                  The whole thrust is the term "jurisdiction". If the U. S. does not have jurisdiction over a foreign national - in other words, if the foreign national still has allegiance to a foreign country - the child of that union is also tied to the foreign country, simply because a child at birth can not pledge allegiance to the U. S. nor can they break the ties with the foreign country.

                                                                  Senatory Howard's words - "Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."

                                                                  This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated:
                                                                  "[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word..."

                                                                  The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship."

                                                                  That was and is the intent of the 14th Amendment. Anchor babies are not U. S. citizens.

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  Reply#11 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:11 AM EDT
                                                                  Laochra

                                                                  That was and is the intent of the 14th Amendment. Anchor babies are not U. S. citizens.

                                                                  Which is funny considering the vast majority of over 35,000,000 Americans (and this is those with Irish anscetory alone let alone any other group) are decedants of "anchor babies". Fact is, pretty much the only group that can complain about immigrants without bleeding hypocrisy is teh Native Americans. And funnily enough, they dont seem to mind half as much as the middle class white Americans of a certain political leaning.

                                                                  • 2 votes
                                                                  #11.1 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:39 PM EDT
                                                                  Reply
                                                                  BD Styers

                                                                  From this point of view, there seems no reason to use the term illegal with immigrants.

                                                                    Reply#12 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:37 AM EDT
                                                                    WatcherInTheShadows

                                                                    A highly biased point of view. This argument centers holding people responsible for the actions of their forefathers. Shall we look at Mexico and by extension Spain's bloody history and MASSIVE wrongs inflicted? You know the people you are trying to defend by calling to mind a travesty and linking it to a situation almost ENTIRELY dissimular. Does the name Cortez ring a bell? Did you know that they enslaved and worked to death almost entire tribes? But tell me, how, exactly does ANYONE have an ability to change the actions of their forefathers?

                                                                    But, then again all these arguments are little more than distractive ad homs aimed at those who are defending their homes from invaders. Why, if you have a problem with it you must be racist and a hypocrite! Despite the fact of what I have pointed out above and the simple fact Mexican is a NATIONALITY not a race. Not that the whole concept of "race" is a stupid and self destructive one ANYWAY. And these "immigrants" as you call them, mostly either, one, have no plans on actually staying here. Or, two, want "La Reconquesta". Trust me, I'm in the middle of it where I live. I see it and hear it every day. I hear it from good people who were Mexican and who are now LEGALLY American with every plan to stay. Not just act like an economic tick while enjoying our benefits with no plans of staying. Or with plans of taking my home from me with such concepts of "La Reconquesta" or "La Raza".

                                                                    It is a travesty sir or ma'am and dishonors the memory of those who's suffering you are using dishonestly to justify the actions of another.

                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                    #12.1 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:52 AM EDT
                                                                    Reply
                                                                    MN American Mom

                                                                    Here now tell me its BS:

                                                                    Grants for school and housing that do not have to be paid back to the government:

                                                                    Look into Native American Grants for Housing. There are also many different grants which are designed to help Native Americans obtain housing. Some offer money to help you build a home and others simply offer grants of land or material. Apply for the type of grant that would suit your needs best. If you can't find out through your tribe about getting a housing grant, there are a few places that can help you obtain information about these types of grants."

                                                                    Additionally, there is the TCEG grant that provides education opportunities exclusively to NA. In fact there are so many freakin grants available only to the NA that its disgusting.

                                                                    50 Million Americans are without health care and the NA are asking the government for an additional 416 million just in healthcare INCREASES thats over and above what they currently get. How did losing your land entitle you to health care? You never had any to begin with. Why should Americans pay this when they have none?

                                                                    There is federally funded program after program for NA. DOI, HHS, HUD, DOJ, DOed, USDA etc...

                                                                    I think the NA have been compensated and this should not continue for generation after generation. You are doing the same thing that you have accused white settlers of doing by taking from innocent people at their expense.

                                                                    Indian Housing Block Grants - http://www.hud.gov/progdesc/ihbg1208.cfm
                                                                    Native American Veteran Direct Loan Program - http://www.federalgrantswire.com/native-american-veteran-direct-loan-program.html

                                                                    "Grants are a great source of help for Native Americans because they do not have to be paid back the way a loan would. Grants can help individuals go to school, build homes and many other things. Use the information above to help you find grants for Native Americans. Good luck."


                                                                    Read more: How to Find Grants for Native Americans | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/how_4823604_grants-native-americans.html#ixzz1c5IWLAVN

                                                                    Read more: How to Find Grants for Native Americans | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/how_4823604_grants-native-americans.html#ixzz1c5I75OQp

                                                                    http://nihb.org/docs/03102010/IHS%20Budget%20Testimony%20_2_.pdf

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    Reply#13 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:10 AM EDT
                                                                    WatcherInTheShadows

                                                                    I say make such things available for everyone.

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #13.1 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:17 AM EDT
                                                                    fstwarrior

                                                                    And, if you'll continue doing your web searches, you'll find like links for Blacks, Asians, Hispanics and for low income for the grant programs.

                                                                      #13.2 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:29 AM EDT
                                                                      MN American Mom

                                                                      That is exactly my point Wraith777. I think all races should have equal rights and opportunities.

                                                                      My family is multi-racial including NA. I cannot support that my Asian grandchildren are not afforded the same opportunities as my NA grandchild. They are equally beautiful and important people and their future should not be defined by their race.

                                                                      fstwarrior stop making futile excuses, its wrong- you know it and I know it. Your race and mine need to meld with respect and caring about each other as a people, not as seperate people who have seperate rights. That will be the only way that we as people in the US can stand together as one. I hope to see that some day with an abundance of equal opportunities for us all!

                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                      #13.3 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:30 AM EDT
                                                                      fstwarrior

                                                                      MN - if you have native roots then you know exactly where I am coming from and where I stand. Yes, we (NA's) believe in treating all with respect and honor - exactly as we expect to be treated. When that treatment is not returned, as do all humans, we put up a wall between us to avoid the occurrence.

                                                                      Separate rights? OK, simple question - if you own a home, you have signed a contract with the bank/mortgage company to perform certain duties and they, in turn, are also signing up to perform certain duties. Then, one day, the bank decides to change its contract with you - without your input - and if you don't adhere to the new contract, the bank can and will take your property from you for non-compliance. The U. S. signed over 700 treaties with over 500 Indian tribes that said, in essence, if you give me all your land and promise not to fight us any more, we will give you these things in return for your land and those promises - as long as you adhere to the treaty. Well, the Indians have adherred to the treaties yet more and more is being taken.

                                                                      Society, i.e. government, is bound and determined to make the Indians part of mainstream America without understanding that we are a separate people. Unlike the Irish, German, French, Italian, etc. immigrants who came over here to "meld" into the pot, we didn't. We were here, with our own cultures/traditions/beliefs/religions, and we were invaded. We do not want to "assimilate" like those immigrants coming into "our" country - we have our cultures and want to continue living them without interference/impedence from outside influences.

                                                                      You only have equal rights and opportunities as the laws afford you. There are 318 laws specifically written covering the Indian - none for the Blacks, Asians, Hispanics - we are required to carry a card identifying that we are Indian - not so the Blacks, Asians, Hispanics. The U. S. government, through its laws/treaties have separated the peoples of Indian Country from the rest of the U. S. - in part, as payment for the atrocities they committed against the Indian in an attempt to "do right" but also as a legally binding tie between sovereign nations - the U. S. and the Indian tribes. We are not the same and do not want to be treated as though we are.

                                                                      This has nothing to do with the article/discussion - you disagree with the Indian status and I disagree with your interpretation.

                                                                      The 14th Amendment needs to be followed as written and intended, not as interpreted by the money crowd.

                                                                        #13.4 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:12 PM EDT
                                                                        WatcherInTheShadows

                                                                        Part Native American *Cherokee* myself. Prefer to identify myself, proudly, as a human mutt. But, either way.

                                                                        Well, the Indians have adhered to the treaties yet more and more is being taken.

                                                                        To be fair, both sides have signed and broken treaties multiple times. To ignore this sounds like victim mentality. Stop being a victim.

                                                                        You only have equal rights and opportunities as the laws afford you. There are 318 laws specifically written covering the Indian - none for the Blacks, Asians, Hispanics - we are required to carry a card identifying that we are Indian - not so the Blacks, Asians, Hispanics.

                                                                        Well you want to be differientated. How exactly do you expect to achieve this otherwise?

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #13.5 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:35 PM EDT
                                                                        fstwarrior

                                                                        Basically to allow us to continue with our traditions/culture/religions/heritage and quit "forcing" us into a melting pot we didn't ask for and don't want - simple.

                                                                          #13.6 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:20 PM EDT
                                                                          tobiii

                                                                          quit "forcing" us into a melting pot we didn't ask for and don't want - simple

                                                                          Take that up with the BIA.

                                                                            #13.7 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:26 PM EDT
                                                                            MN American Mom

                                                                            I don't think you have to stop your traditions, culture, religion, or heritage. Nor has society asked you to.

                                                                            My family celebrates those differences. Trust me, it took alot to get me to try fish oil that is used in Asian cooking. I love it and now own my own bottle. I didn't know wild rice is actually green after its whacked off the plant and falls into the canoe. I love wild rice to and think its cool the way its harvested. Those traditions need to be carried forward and no one is trying to stop it. Acknowledging the differences does not make someone fit into any melting pot. Your part of that pot just by being a citizen of the US and a member of society whether you like it or not. I enjoyed attending an Indian dance with the beautiful traditional dress and learning the drum is a heartbeat, I loved seeing my other grandchildren in tradtional Hmong outfits and think its cute when my daughter in law translates my conversation with her Mom who speaks little English. Funny, but somehow we can understand much of what each other is trying to say with gestures. We celebrate another grandchilds Mexican heritage and holidays. We also celebrate traditional white holidays and customs as well. Its awesome to have the entire experience.

                                                                            You say you want to be differentiated yet you CHOOSE to assimilate yourself into a society that you primarily see as dictated by whites. Your driving your cars, buying homes with all the luxuries.

                                                                            You say you want to live differently but I have not seen 1 Indian family living in a way other than what the rest of the melting pot is living like so maybe I am not understanding what you would do differently and what is stopping you?

                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                            #13.8 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:52 PM EDT
                                                                            Reply
                                                                            WatcherInTheShadows

                                                                            @fstwarrior:

                                                                            I'm sorry sir or ma'am but you did not address my question.

                                                                              Reply#14 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:31 PM EDT
                                                                              fstwarrior

                                                                              And, based on all of the questions you've asked, I can only assume you haven't read the article because all I have seen are questions relating to comments submitted.

                                                                              Thanks for visiting.

                                                                                #14.1 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:26 PM EDT
                                                                                WatcherInTheShadows

                                                                                Again.

                                                                                Well you want to be differientated. How exactly do you expect to achieve this otherwise?

                                                                                You want them to judge purely on looks?

                                                                                  #14.2 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:58 PM EDT
                                                                                  fstwarrior

                                                                                  #13.6 - read into it what you will - but, it is very straight forward.

                                                                                    #14.3 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:36 PM EDT
                                                                                    WatcherInTheShadows

                                                                                    Which has absolutely nothing to do with the statement that elicted my question. In case you forget.

                                                                                    You only have equal rights and opportunities as the laws afford you. There are 318 laws specifically written covering the Indian - none for the Blacks, Asians, Hispanics - we are required to carry a card identifying that we are Indian - not so the Blacks, Asians, Hispanics.

                                                                                    I am not exactly sure why you are avoiding it I must confess.

                                                                                      #14.4 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:41 PM EDT
                                                                                      fstwarrior

                                                                                      And the basis of your comment on the article is what?

                                                                                        #14.5 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:14 PM EDT
                                                                                        WatcherInTheShadows

                                                                                        And your deflective tactic is that?

                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                        #14.6 - Sat Oct 29, 2011 8:19 PM EDT
                                                                                        Reply
                                                                                        kribemDeleted
                                                                                        james-1932304

                                                                                        The question to anyone is what dose it mean to be Human, an to keep it real simple. when/if I can't get pass- the I'am better than you attitude/mentality syndrome, all communication fails and destruction continues on many levels even until death. Our religion,politic,laws, and education has failed America as a whole simply because some men and women refused to learn, the poor as well as the rich would do better if they would ask them self the question why must I destroy them. And this is the Education that's missing in America..............manipulation in not a solution ..... an we know that to be true.

                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                        Reply#16 - Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:13 AM EDT
                                                                                        BD Styers

                                                                                        Rhetorical or what? My first thought refers to a presidential speech I cannot quote, but he said something like I shouldn't expect you to give up your dream for someone else's dream.

                                                                                        Our education is geared for a specific purpose. Our forebears asked for it, we got it. What shall we leave for our children?

                                                                                          #16.1 - Sat Oct 29, 2011 5:06 AM EDT
                                                                                          Reply
                                                                                          Leave a Comment:
                                                                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                                          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                                                          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                                                          Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                                          FUN STUFF:
                                                                                          • Leaderboard |
                                                                                          • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                                                          • Top of the Vine |
                                                                                          • Newsvine Live |
                                                                                          • Newsvine Archives |
                                                                                          • The Greenhouse |
                                                                                          COMPANY STUFF:
                                                                                          • Code of Honor |
                                                                                          • Company Info |
                                                                                          • Contact Us |
                                                                                          • Jobs |
                                                                                          • User Agreement |
                                                                                          • Privacy Policy |
                                                                                          • About our ads
                                                                                          LEGAL STUFF:
                                                                                          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                                          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                                          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com